با همکاری انجمن آبخیزداری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع ‎طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران

2 دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع‎طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران

3 پژوهشگر پسادکتری علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع‎طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران

4 دانشجویان دکتری علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع‎طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران

چکیده

چکیده مبسوط
مقدمه
امروزه تخریب منابع طبیعی، احتمال کمبود و بحران منابع موردنیاز برای رفاه انسان را افزایش داده است. ازاین‌رو، برای جلوگیری از تخریب بیشتر زمین، توسعه سیاست‌ها و راهبردهای مؤثر ضرورت پیدا کرده است. در این راستا، هرساله هزینه‌های قابل‌توجهی صرف حفاظت از منابع طبیعی و مهار روند تخریب آنها در قالب مطالعات و پروژه‌های اجرایی می‌شود که در بیشتر موارد از استاندارد مطلوب برخوردار نبوده و نیازمند یک برنامه جامع و نظام‌مند است. در همین ارتباط، مدیریت آبخیز کشور با مشکلات و چالش‌های فراوانی مواجه است که برای رفع آن بایستی رویکردهای جدید مدیریت جامع حوزه‌های آبخیز با در نظر گرفتن تمامی جنبه‌های مؤثر و تأثیرگذار بر آبخیزها مدنظر قرار گیرد.
 
مواد و روش‌­ها
در این پژوهش، ابتدا بازخوانی مطالعات تفصیلی-اجرایی حوزه آبخیز دفت‌آباد خراسان جنوبی با هدف شناخت مشکلات آبخیز انجام شد. همچنین، بازدیدهای لازم برای شناخت هرچه بیشتر آبخیز صورت گرفت. سپس، فهرست مشکلات و چالش‌های منطقه تهیه و در ساختار استخوان ماهی جانمایی شد. در ادامه، ارکان مدیریت جامع حوزه آبخیز مشتمل بر شش رکن قانونی، سیاستی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و دانش مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. در ادامه جایگاه این آبخیز در نردبان مدیریت آبخیز تعیین شد. در نهایت، به‌منظور بررسی لحاظ جامعیت رویکردهای مذکور، ویژگی‌های آبخیزداری مطلوب در مطالعات تفصیلی-اجرایی بررسی شد. در انتها نیز راهکارهای اجمالی لازم برای بهبود مطالعات تفصیلی-اجرایی ارائه شده است.
 
نتایج و بحث
ارزیابی نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، اگرچه مطالعات پژوهشی و واحد مدیریتی آبخیز در حوزه آبخیز لحاظ شده اما عدم کاربست رویکرد سلامت و پایداری آبخیز سبب شده است تا آبخیز دفت‌‎آباد در پله پژوهشی-اجرایی از نردبان آبخیز قرار گیرد. همچنین، رویکردهای کنونی مدیریت آبخیز دفت‌‎آباد با چالش‌های جدی مواجه است. عوامل متعددی ازجمله الگوهای نامناسب مدیریت، تغییرات اقلیمی، عدم مشارکت فعال جوامع محلی، کمبود سرمایه‌گذاری، عدم بهره‌برداری از فرصت‌های اقتصادی و توانمندی‌‌های منطقه و مسائل اقتصادی-اجتماعی موجود این آبخیز را در معرض آسیب‌پذیری جدی قرار داده است. همچنین، عدم ارزیابی نیازهای مختلف جمعتی به خصوص نیازهای بانوان در رده‌های مختلف سنی سبب شده است تا راهکارهای مختلف مدیریت جمعیت در کوتاه و بلند مدت دیده نشود. از طرفی دیگر، بهره‌گیری از توانمندی‌های اقتصادی آبخیزها در راستای تولید محصولات، بازاریابی محصولات تولید‌شده و گسترش بوم‌گردی می‌تواند فقر عمومی را کاهش داده و تقویت اقتصادی جوامع محلی را در پی داشته باشد. به‌طور‌کلی، با رعایت رویکردهای اشاره شده در این پژوهش و ارتقای مطالعات تفصیلی-اجرایی می‌توان روند فعلی آبخیزها را بهبود بخشید و از هدررفت منابع آب‌و‌خاک و مهاجرت بی‌وقفه مردم به شهرهای بزرگ‌تر و مشکلات محیط‌زیستی کاست. لذا، این برنامه نیازمند مشارکت فعال همه گروداران ازجمله دولت، بخش خصوصی، سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد و جوامع محلی در طراحی و اجراست. تقویت مشارکت جوامع محلی، سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی متناسب با سلامت و پایداری حوضه، سرمایه‌گذاری در بخش‌های مختلف و زیرساخت‌ها، حمایت از گروه‌های آسیب‌پذیر و همچنین توجه به دانش بومی و تجربیات محلی در کنار استفاده از دانش علمی و تخصصی می‌تواند به موفقیت این برنامه کمک شایانی کند.
 
نتیجه­‌گیری
این پژوهش با تأکید بر ضرورت اتخاذ رویکردی جامع و مشارکتی، راه‌کارهای لازم برای بهبود مدیریت آبخیز دفت‌آباد را ارائه داده است. رویکرد‌های ارائه‌‎شده و نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند برای مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران حوزه منابع طبیعی و به‎ویژه آبخیزداری مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. براین اساس پیشنهاد می­‌شود مدیران و برنامه‌ریزان در رده‌های مختلف مدیریتی ضمن توجه هرچه بیشتر به مشارکت جوامع محلی، ارزیابی، پایش و سنجش اثرات طرح‌های اجراشده را در اولویت قرار دهد تا در بلندمدت بتوانند همزمان با حفظ و احیاء آبخیزهای سالم، از مهاجرت آبخیزنشینان به شهرهای همجوار و بروز مشکلات متعدد در آنها جلوگیری کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of desirable characteristics of watershed management in detailed-implementation studies of the watershed management, case study: Daftabad Watershed, South Khorasan, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi 1
  • Roghayeh Alipour 2
  • Hasan Fereydoni 2
  • Fatemeh Zahra Enayati 2
  • Alireza Pakravan 2
  • Reza Yaghoti 2
  • Mitra Moradnezhad 2
  • Fatemeh Esmailzadeh Ashini 2
  • Fatemeh Abdolbaghi 2
  • Sahar Mousavian 2
  • Reza Chamani 3
  • Marjan Bahlekeh 4
  • Hamed Beigi 4

1 Professor, Department of Watershed Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

2 M.Sc. Students in Watershed Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

3 Postdoctoral Fellow in Watershed Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

4 Ph.D. Students in Watershed Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
Introduction
Today, the destruction of natural resources has increased the possibility of shortages and crises of resources needed for human well-being. Therefore, to prevent further land degradation, it has become necessary to develop effective policies and strategies. In this regard, significant costs are spent every year on protecting natural resources and controling their degradation in the form of studies and executive projects, which in most cases do not meet the desired standard and require a comprehensive and systematic plan. In this regard, the country's watershed management faces many problems and challenges, which must be addressed by new approaches to comprehensive watershed management, taking into account all effective and influential aspects of watersheds.
 
Materials and methods
In this research, first, a review of the detailed-executive studies of the Daftabad Watershed in South Khorasan Province, Iran was conducted with the aim of identifying the problems of the watershed. Also, the necessary visits were made to understand the watershed as much as possible. Then, a list of the problems and challenges of the region was prepared and placed in a fishbone diagram. The study evaluated the six pillars of comprehensive watershed management, viz., legal, policy, economic, social, cultural, and knowledge, and addressed their position in the watershed management ladder.
 
Results and discussion
The research evaluation shows that although research studies and a watershed management unit have been included in the watershed, the failure to implement a watershed health and sustainability approach has caused the Daft Abad Watershed to be placed on the research-implementation rung of the watershed ladder. The research assessment shows that current approaches to managing the Daftabad Watershed face serious challenges. Several factors, including inappropriate management patterns, climate change, lack of active participation of local communities, lack of investment, lack of exploitation of economic opportunities and capabilities of the region, and existing socio-economic issues, have exposed this watershed to serious vulnerability. Also, the lack of assessment of the various needs of the population, especially the needs of women in different age groups, has led to the lack of various solutions for population management in the short- and long-term. On the other hand, utilizing the economic capabilities of the Daft Abad Watershed, especially in agriculture and barberry cultivation, to produce products, market the produced products, and expand ecotourism can reduce general poverty and strengthen the economy of local communities. In this regard, utilizing the economic capabilities of watersheds in order to produce products, market the produced products, and expand ecotourism can reduce general poverty and strengthen the economy of local communities. In general, by observing the approaches mentioned in this research and promoting detailed executive studies, the current trend of watersheds can be improved, and the waste of water and soil resources, the continuous migration of people to larger cities, and environmental problems can be reduced. Therefore, this program requires the active participation of all stakeholders, including the government, the private sector, non-governmental organizations, and local communities in the design and implementation. Strengthening the participation of local communities, policy-making and planning that is appropriate for the health and sustainability of the area investing in various sectors and infrastructure, supporting vulnerable groups, as well as paying attention to Indigenous knowledge and local experiences, along with using scientific and specialized knowledge, can significantly contribute to the success of this program.
 
Conclusions
This study emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and participatory approach, providing solutions for improving the management of the Daftabad Watershed. The results can serve as a model for managers and policymakers in natural resource and watershed management, highlighting the need for holistic and inclusive strategies to ensure sustainable development and resilience. Accordingly, it is recommended that managers and planners at various levels of management, while paying significant attention to the participation of local communities, prioritize the evaluation, monitoring, and measurement of the effects of implemented projects so that in the long-term, they can simultaneously preserve and restore healthy watersheds and prevent the migration of watershed residents to neighboring cities and the emergence of numerous problems in those cities.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fishbone structure
  • Integrated watershed fundamentals
  • Watershed governance
  • Watershed health
  • Watershed management ladder
Abdollahi, V., Arzani, H., Zare Chahoki, M.A., Movahed Mohammadi, H., Haderbadi, G., 2020. Rangeland zoning for sheep and goats common grazing in the Darmian Basin (South Khorasan Province). J. Plant Ecosys. Conserv. 8 (16), 15-36 (in Persian).
Akbargholi, F., Vafaei, M., 2019. The role of capacities of tourism areas in the area of influence of Mashhad metropolis in sustainable urban development, case example: Abardeh village. Sci. Quart. J. Urban Ecology Res. 10(20), 77-96 (in Persian).
Alesina, A.,Tabellini, M., 2024. The political effects of immigration: Culture or economics?. Econo. Literat. 62(1), 5-46.
Bagherian, R., Rezaee, J., Broshke, A., Kalat, A.B., Jafari, A., Raahimi, H., 2014. Evaluation of socio economic impacts of flood water spreading projects among neighboring villages. Exten. Develop. Watershed Manage. 3(9), 39-45 (in Persian).
Baniadadi, M., Palouch, M., 2020. Designing the optimal governance model of underground water resources at the level of the watershed, Erzuye watershed-Kerman Province. Watershed Engin. Manage. 12(2), 514-525 (in Persian).
Bekele, Y., Kebede, B., Kuma, T., 2023. Assessing the role of community participation in integrated watershed management in Dandi Lake watershed Dandi district, West Showa, Oromia, Ethiopia. Appli. Water Sci. 13(11), 207.
Bilotto, F., Harrison, M.T., Vibart, R., Mackay, A., Christie-Whitehead, K.M., Ferreira, C.S., Cottrell, R.S., Forster, D., Chang, J., 2024. Towards resilient, inclusive, sustainable livestock farming systems. Trends Food Sci Technol.104668.
Boynazarova, N., 2023. Issues of environmental protection and formation of ecological culture of primary class students. World Bullet. Social Sci. 27, 10-12.
Chamani, R., Shekohideh, H., Zare, S., Zarei, R., Amini, H., Hemati, L., Moosavi, V., Khaledi Darvishan, A., 2024. Application of SWOT analysis with separation of natural and anthropogenic factors in the integrated management of the Mikhsaz Watershed, Mazandaran Province. Watershed Engin. Manage. 15(4), 588-602.
Dadrasi Sabzevar, A., Ghazanchian, A., Namaki, M., 2016. The factors analysis of information, related to socio-economic effects of watershed management activities, according to the villagers point of view of Gosh watershed of Mashhad. Watershed Engin. Manage. 8(3), 290-302 (in Persian).
Darabi, M., Malekinezhad, H., Talebi, A., Hidari, M., 2020. Assessment of watershed management performance on flooding status in Sivand Dam, Fars Province. Hydrogeomorphol. 7(23), 105-83 (in Persian).
Davudirad, A., Salehpou Jam, A., Najmi, M., Akhondi, O., 2022. Identifying and prioritizing effective factors in preventing participation of rural societies in watershed management projects: a case study of Bozijan Watershed, Markazi province, Iran. Desert Ecosys. Engin. 10(30), 52-64 (in Persion).
Duan, T., Feng, J., Chang, X., Li, Y., 2022. Watershed health assessment using the coupled integrated multistatistic analyses and PSIR framework. Sci. Total Environ. 847, 157523.
Ebrahimi Gatgash, Z., Sadeghi, S.H.R., 2024. Comparative effect of conventional and
adaptive management approaches on watershed health. Soil Till. Res. 235, 105869.
Eslami A., Noor, H., 2022. Investigating and prioritizing factors affecting the non-participation of rural societies in watershed management projects (case study: Asadli Watershed, North Khorasan Provience). Rainwater Catch. Syst. 10(2), 1 (in Persian).
Faraji, D., Olian, M., Fathi, A., 2018. Future perspectives on the regional impact of urmia lake drought with a political approach. Geograph. Territor. Spatial Arrange. 8(27), 37-54. (in Persian).
Gao, J., Christensen, P., Li, W., 2017. Application of the WEAP model in strategic environmental assessment: experiences from a case study in an arid/semi-arid area in China. Environ. Manag. 371-363.
General Department of Natural Resources and Watershed of South Khorasan., 2010. (in Persian).
Ghaleno, M.R.D., Meshram, S.G., Alvandi, E., 2020. Pragmatic approach for prioritization of flood and sedimentation hazard potential of Watersheds. Soft Comput. 24, 15701–15714.
Ghoddousi, J., 1999. Evaluation plan for watershed projects. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute. (in Persian).
Ghorbani, M., Salimi Khochi, J., Ebrahimi, P., Rasekhi, S., 2019. The application of network analysis in identifying the key actors of the network of local stakeholders in order to establish cooperative management of natural resources (Study area: Sarayan watershed, South Khorasan Province. Rangeland Watershed Manage. 1(72), 213-226. (in Persian).
Giglou, A.N., Nazari, R., Karimi, M., Museru, M.L., Opare, K.N., Nikoo, M.R., 2024. Future eco-hydrological dynamics: Urbanization and climate change effects in a changing landscape: a case study of Birmingham's river basin. Cleaner Produc. 447, 141320.
Hazbavi, Z., 2018. Importance of geology and geomorphology in Watershed health assessment. Agricul. Forest. 64 (4), 277-287.
Hazbavi, Z., Sadeghi, S.H.R., 2017. Watershed health characterization using reliabilityresilience–vulnerability conceptual framework based on hydrological responses. Land Degrada. Develop 28(5), 1528-1537.
Henriksen, H., Barlebo, H., 2008. Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. Environ. Manage. 88(4), 1025–1036.
Jabbari, I., 2021. development of science, interdisciplinary thinking and the risk of fundamental damage to the geography of Iran. Geograph. Environ. Sustain. 11(3), 1-8. (in persian).
Jamali, A., Raeesi, N., 2015. Socio-economic evaluation of watershed mechanical projects in Matesang watershed-Nikshahr. Watershed Engin. Manage. 7(3), 331-340. (in Persian).
Karimi, A., Sheikh, M., 2020. Evaluating the attitude of watershed residents towards natural resources and environment projects, case study: Habale Roud Watershed. Watershed Engin. Manage. 11(2), 470-467. (in Persian).
Karpisheh, L., 2021. Indigenous methods of drought risk reduction and challenges of integrating it with scientific methods. Geograph. Human Relation. 3(3), 307-322. (in Persian).
Kavandi, H.R., Heshmati, G.A., Siroosi, H., 2014. Evaluation of alternative livelihoods status in arid and semiarid regions of Iran to improve sustainability. Rangeland Sci. 4(4), 306-318. (in Persian).
Kepha, Z.A., Omollo, W.O., Nyaiyo, N.M., 2024. The Impact of community participation modes on watershed degradation in Upper Gucha, Kenya. Asian J. Geograph. Res. 7(2), 74-87.
Keys, P.W., Collins, P.M., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Wang-Erlandsson, L., 2024. Atmospheric water recycling an essential feature of critical natural asset stewardship. Global Sustain. 7, e2.
Khashei, V., Ebrahimi, M., Kaffash, H., 2024. comparative study of sensemakinng schools in organization and management studies. Public Manage. Res. 17(64), 101-136. (in Persian).
Khosravi, Y., Hassanzadeh-Rangi, N., Hassanbeigi, M.R., 2023. Health and safety assessment of the working environment in oil and gas terminals in Iran. Environ. Health Engin. 11(1), 89-103. (in Persian).
Mabuza, M.P., 2019. Globalisation, climate change, and disasters. Evaluating International Public Health Issues. 265-313.
Meena, D.C., Chand, P., 2023. Does people’s participation enhance the success of watersheds? A comprehensive assessment. Soil Water Conserv. 22(2), 169-177.
Merlo-Galeazzi, A., Avila-Foucat, V.S., Perevochtchikova, M., 2024. Analysis of the watershed social–ecological system trajectory in Copalita-Huatulco, Mexico: The impact of drivers on hydrological ecosystem services. Ambio. 1-16.
Mirdeylami, S.Z., Heshmati, G.A., Hemmatzade, Y., 2011. Land use planning based on two-hybrid methods the current systemic module at Kachik's watershed in Golestan Province. Applied RS GIS Techniq. Nat. Resour. Sci. 2(3), 65-75. (in Persian).
Moghaddasi, N., Sheikh, V.B. Najafinejad, A., 2015. Qualitative evaluation of watershed management projects using descriptive-correlation method (case study: Boostan dam watershed). Water Soil Conserv. 22(2), 205-218 (in Persian).
Mohammadi Ostadkelayeh, A., Toomaj, A., Mehrabi Nia, F., Bahlake, M., 2022. Investigating the relationship between spatial resilience and individual resilience of areas subject to resettlement plan, case study of northeastern flooded areas of Golestan Province. Geograph. Environ. Hazards, 11(2), 127-142. (in Persian).
Mosaffaie, J., Nikkami, D., Salehpour Jam, A., 2019. Watershed management in Iran: History, evolution and future needs. Watershed Engin. Manage 11(2), 283-300. (in Persian).
Motavali, H.A., Rezaei, A.R., Hejazi, Y., Elmbaygi, A., 2021. Analysis of the policy network in the participatory management of natural resources, a case Study of the Hable Rood Watershed. Econo. Res. Agricul. Develop. Iran (in Persian).
Moteshaffeh, B., Javanmard, M., Hashem Geloogerdi, S., 2024. Social network analysis of local stakeholders in water and soil resources co-management in Behbahan Ghale Seyed Moghim and Khaeiz villages. Watershed Manage. Res. 37(3), 111-127  (in Persian).
Muche, A.T., Ketsela, Y.S., Ali, B.M., 2024. Assessing the effectiveness of integrated watershed management practices and suggesting innovative strategies in southern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 10(19).
Mutekanga, F., 2012. Participatory policy development for integrated Watershed management in Uganda’s highlands. PhD Thesis University of Wageningen.
Nasiri Khiavi, A., Vafakhah, M., Sadeghi, S.H.R., 2022. Application of participatory approach in identifying critical sub-Watersheds based on flood generation potential in the Cheshmeh-Kileh Watershed, Mazandaran Province. Water Soil Manage. Model. 3(3), 90-107. (in Persian).
Nasrnia, F., Zebaei, M., Bakhshoodeh, M., 2018. Vulnerability of farmers in Bakhtegan basin before and after drought: econometric approach. Agricul. Econom. 12(3), 47-71. (in Persian).
Navidi, F., Riyahinia, N., 2017. The role of documentation in organizational knowledge management: a case study at satellite research institute. Quart. J. Library Inf. Sci. Studies. 19, 3-20. (in Persian).
Newaz, M.W., Rahman, M.S., 2022. Politics of decentralization and management of natural resources: An institutional analysis of commons in northeast Bangladesh. Environ. Develop. 44, 100740.
Ninan, K.N., Lakshmikanthamma, S., 2001. Social cost-benefit analysis of a watershed development project in Karnataka, India. Ambio. 30, 157-161.
Pahl-Wostl, C., 2007. Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour. Manage. 21(1), 49-62.
Peyrowan, H.R., Bayat, R., Arabkhedri, M., 2019. Investigating the geological potential of the Birjand area for establishing and extending flood farms (Bandsar). Rainwater Catch. Syst. 7(2), 1-14. (in Persian).
Ramesht, M., Ahmadi, A., Ara, H., 2010. Watersheds from a systemic perspective, case study: Gamasiab River Watershed. Urban Ecolo. Res. 1(1), 127-136. (in Persian).
Rastegari, M., Saraei, M.H., 2016. A comparative analysis of facility level and population distribution in urban network of Yazd Province. J. Urban Econo. Manage. 4(15), 1-17. (in Persian).
Sabri, S., Ezatpanah, B., Taghavi, E., 2023. Evaluation the local stakeholder’s assumption in facing the consequences of climate change and its effects on population and activity resilience structure, case study: Orumieh metropolis. Geograph. Studies Mountain. Areas. 4(16), 129-152. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, S.H., Hasanpour, F., Payfeshoordeh, A., Tavakoli, F., Esmail Zadeh, F., Abdulbaghi, F., Rashidi, N., Mousavian, S., Beigi, H., Bahlekeh, M., Chamani, R., 2024. Position of the Fakhran Watershed in Iran’s South Khorasan Province in the watershed management ladder. Integrat. Watershed Manage. 4(2), 1-19. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Khaledi Darvishan, A., Vafakhah, M., Moradi Rekabdarkalaei, H.R., Nasiri Khiyavi, A., 2021. Comprehensive and problem-oriented watershed management using strategic planning framework. Watershed Sci. Engin. 15(52), 63-66. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Payfeshoordeh, A., Pirooznia, P., Piri, S., Hamzeh Bibalani, M., Khairparast, M., Sarouneh, F., Mostafaei Younjali, S., Naderi Marangelu, N., Noori., A., Havasi, M. Chamani, R., 2023. Revisiting the detailed-implementation studies of the Fakhran Watershed in South Khorasan based on the integrated watershed management plan. Integrat. Watershed Manage. 2(4), 1-16. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Sharifi Moghadam, A., Mohseni Saravi, M., 2019. New approaches in applied watershed management. Gorgan University of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications, 267. (in Persian).
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Tavoosi, M., Zare, S., Beiranvandi, V., Shekohideh, H., Akbari Emamzadeh, F., Bahlekeh, M., Khorshid Sokhangoy, F., Chamani, R., 2022. Evaluation and variability of flood-oriented health of Shiraz Darwazeh Quran watershed from watershed management structures. Water Soil. 36(5), 561-577. (in Persian).
Salehpour Jam, A., Mosaffaie, J., 2023. Introducing the concept of a ladder of watershed management: a stimulus to promote watershed management approaches. Environ. Sci. Policy. 147, 315-325.
Salehpour Jam, A., Mosaffaie, J., Tabatabaei, M.R., 2021. Management responses for Chehel-Chay Watershed health improvement using the DPSIR framework. Agric. Sci. Technol. 23, 797–811.
Shafiee, F., 2023. Designing an extension model for agricultural knowledge dissemination in Galugah County, Mazandaran province, Iran. Agricul. Econo. Develop. Res. 54(4), 789-808. (in Persian).
Shahbazian, A., Zeraarkish, S.Y., Mohammadinejad, A., 2022. The effect of credits on the investment motivation of the agricultural sector and its sociological explanation. Politic. Socio. Iran 5(6), 267-285. (in Persian).
Shakoori, A., 2024. Indigenous knowledge and rural development: origins and challenges. Rural Res. 15(2), 226-239. (in Persian).
Shamshiri R.R., Mahadi, M.R., Thorp, K.R., Ismail, I.W., Kelly, R., Ahmad, D., Man, H.C., 2017. Adaptive management framework for evaluating and adjusting microclimate parameters in tropical greenhouse crop production systems. INTECH Publication. Book title: Plant Engineering.
Sharifi Moghadam, E., Sadeghi, S.H., Zarghami, M., Delavar, M., 2023. Developing sustainable land-use patterns at watershed scale using nexus of soil, water, energy, and food. Sci. Total Environ. 856, 158935.
Sharifi Moghadam, E., Sadeghi, S.H.R., Zarghami, M., Delavar, M., 2019. Water-energy-food nexus as a new approach for watershed resources management: a review. Environ. Resour. Res. 7(2), 129-135.
Soltani, A., Ghazavi, R., Dokhani, S., 2024. Investigating factors affecting the participation and behavior of stakeholders in water and soil Conservation projects, case of study: Benchele watershed, Ravansar city. Integrat. Watershed Manage. 4(1), 1-15. (in Persian).
Tajbakhsh, S.M., Memarian, H., Parsasadr, H., 2021. Evaluation of quantitative impact of watershed management projects on underground water level, case study: Jamab Project. Rainwater Catch. Syst. 8(4), 51-62. (in Persian).
Tarabon, S., Berg`es, L., Dutoit, T., Isselin-Nondedeu, F., 2019. Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling. Environ. Manag. 241, 439–449.
Tesfahunegn, G.B., Ayuk, E.T., 2021. Opportunities and challenges to adopting sustainable watershed management interventions: An overview of experiences from Ethiopia. A Nexus Approach Sustain. Develop. 165-183.
Wang, J., Zhou, W., Guan, Y., 2022. Optimization of management by analyzing ecosystem service value variations in different Watersheds in the Three-River Headwaters Basin. Environ. Manage. 321, 115956.
Wen, J., Hou, K., 2021. Research on the progress of regional ecological security evaluation and optimization of its common limitations. Ecolog. Indicat. 127, 107797.
Yu, D.J., Shin, H.C., Olivier, T., Garcia, M., Meerow, S., Park, J., 2024. Logical interdependencies in infrastructure: What are they, how to identify them, and what do they mean for infrastructure risk analysis?. Risk Analy, 16555.
Zare, Sh., Hayati, D., 2015. Environmental, social, and economic impacts of modern irrigation and drainage networks in Korbal plain and their determinants as perceived by beneficiaries. Water Res.  Agricul. 29(3), 379-395 (in Persian).