با همکاری انجمن آبخیزداری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویرشناسی دانشگاه یزد

2 استاد، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویرشناسی، دانشگاه یزد

3 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه اردکان

چکیده

امروزه پروژه­های مختلف آبخیزداری در حوزه­های آبخیز اجرا می­‌شود، گاهی این پروژه‌­ها با وجود مطالعه و هزینه بالا به‌دلایل مختلف ناکارآمد بوده، با شکست اقتصادی مواجه می­‌شوند. در مطالعه حاضر، ابتدا پروژه­‌های آبخیزداری انجام شده در حوضه پارسل A سد قشلاق سنندج معرفی شد. سپس، ارزیابی آن‌­ها با تعیین عوامل داخلی و خارجی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. هدف استخراج مهمترین عوامل و ارائه راهبردهایی است که پروژه‌­ها از نظر اقتصادی مفیدتر و از نظر عملکردی موثرتر باشند. بنابراین، ضمن تعیین نقاط ضعف، قوت، فرصت­‌ها و تهدیدها با استفاده از پرسشگری از خبرگان، با کاربرد مدل تحلیلی SWOT و ماتریس کمی QSPM راهبردهای اجرایی-اقتصادی ارائه شدند. نتایج به‌­دست آمده وزن بالای عوامل مدیریتی را نشان دادند. به‌­طوری­‌که بیشترین ارزش نهایی در عوامل خارجی را طرح‌­های مطالعاتی ناکارآمد و عدم اختصاص بودجه برای تعمیر و نگهداری پروژه‌­ها با امتیازهای 0.50 و 0.43 به خود اختصاص دادند. در عوامل داخلی بیشترین ارزش نهایی مربوط به تخریب و مدفون شدن سدها در اثر پایین بودن کیفیت ساخت با امتیاز 0.59 بود. بر اساس نتایج مدل SWOT، وضعیت راهبردی در ربع ST و WT قرار گرفته، از نوع محافظه‌­کارانه و تدافعی است. یعنی راهبرد باید در جهت کاهش زیان ناشی از تهدیدها و نقاط ضعف با استفاده از نقاط قوت حوضه باشد. مطابق با این استراتژی راهبردها به­‌وسیله متخصصین ارائه و با استفاده از ماتریس کمی QSPM اولویت­‌بندی شدند. راهبرد اجرای پروژه­‌ها در اراضی تحت مالکیت افراد و یا واگذاری حق تعمیر و نگهداری آن­‌ها به مالکین با امتیاز نهایی 8.76 در اولویت اول قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش، نه‌­تنها می‌­تواند در راستای آگاهی از عوامل ضعف در پروژه­‌ها کمک کند، بلکه می‌­تواند در بهبود بازدهی اقتصادی پروژه­‌ها نیز مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of factors affecting the performance and economic productivity of watershed management projects using SWOT model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mina Jafari 1
  • Mohammad Reza Ekhtesasi 2
  • Ahmad Fatahi Ardakani 3

1 Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertification, Yazd University

2 Professor, Department of Natural Resources and Desertification, Yazd University

3 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ardakan, Yazd, Iran

چکیده [English]

Today, various watershed management projects are being implemented in watersheds which sometimes, despite high study and cost, they are inefficient for various reasons and face economic failure. In the present study, first, different watershed projects in the Parcel A of Gheshlagh Dam in Sanandaj were evaluated. Then, their evaluation was examined by determining internal and external factors. The aim is to extract the most important factors and provide strategies that make projects economically viable and functionally effective. Weaknesses, strengths, opportunities, and threats of the region were extracted by experts and, using the SWOT analysis model and quantitative matrix of QSPM, economic-applicable solutions were presented. Results showed high value of management factors, so that the highest final value in external factors was inefficient study projects and the lack of funds for maintenance and repair of projects after implementation with scores of 0.50 and 0.43, respectively, and internal factors had the highest final value related to destruction and burial of dams due to the low quality of construction with a score of 0.59 which had the most impact on strategy selection. Based on the results of the model, the strategies are located in the ST quarter and are of a conservative method, in order to reduce the damage caused by threats and weaknesses by using the strengths of the domain. In accordance with this strategy, solutions were given by experts and prioritized by the quantitative matrix QSPM. The implementation of projects on land owned by individuals or the assignment of the right to maintain them to the owners with a final score of 8.76 was ranked first. The results of this research in the present economic situation of the country are very useful for informing authorities about how to optimize the implementation of watershed projects and will improve the instructions and implementation and the best use of projects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Decision making models
  • Economic evaluation
  • Gheshlagh Dam
  • Sanandaj
  • Watershed management projects
  1. Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., B. Souri and M. Pirbavaghar. 2013. Evaluating the environmental capacity of the territory for the development of rangeland user, case study: parcel A of Gheshlag Dam Basin. Journal of Grassland and Watershed Management, 66(3): 322-334 (in Persian).
  2. Amoubaigi, A. and D. Haiati. 2013. Evaluating the effects of implementation of a comprehensive management plan for natural resources and watershed of the West Shiraz Watershed on the environment of the region from the users' perspectives. Environmental Sciences Quarterly, 11: 33-52 (in Persian).
  3. Asadi Nelivan, O., M. Mohseni Saravi, Gh. Zahedi Amiri and A. Nazari Samani. 2016. Application of the a method in assessing the stability of the watershed, case study: Taleghan-Zidashht Watershed. Pasture and Watershed Management, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 69(3): 543-559 (in Persian).
  4. Chezgi, J., H. Malekinejad, M. Ekhtesasi and M. Nakheei. 2018. A comprehensive and suitable strategy for the development of underground dam construction using SWOT and quantitative matrix QSPM, case study: Caryan Basin. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 1(22): 187-198 (in Persian).
  5. Jazi, H., Z. Korkeabadi and S. Kamiabi. 2017. Sustainable development strategies of upper watershed cities, case study of Garmsar Township. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 9: 426-440 (in Persian).
  6. Molaei Hashjin, N. and K. Zahedi Dafchahi. 2010. Planning integrated rural development using SWOT analysis model in Khomam district, Rasht. Rural Research Quarterly, 1(22): 133-154 (in Persian).
  7. Nazari, B., A. Liaghatb, M.R. Akbaric and M. Keshavarzd. 2018. Irrigation water management in Iran: implications for water use efficiency improvement. Agricultural Water Management, 208: 7–18.
  8. Pazouki, M., S.A. Jozi and Y.A. Ziari. 2017. Strategic management in urban environment using SWOT and QSPM model. Global Journal Environment Science Management, 3(2): 207-216.
  9. Pearce, J.A. andB., Robinson. 2014. Strategic management: formulation, implementation and control. Translated by Sohrab Khalili Shorini. Yadvare Ketab, 624 pages (in Persian).
  10. Petousi, I., M. Fountoulakis, A. Papadaki, I. Sabathianakis, G. Daskalakis, N. Nikolaidis and T. Manios. 2017. Assessment of water management measures through SWOT analysis: the case of Crete Island, Greece. International Journal of Environmental Science, 2: 59-62.
  11. Pohekar, S.D. and M. Ramachandran. 2004. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning. Renew Sustain Energy, 8(1): 365-38.
  12. Rahmani, B., M. Shams and S. Hatamifar. 2010. Feasibility study on tourism development in Malayer using SWOT model. Geography Quarterly and Environmental Studies Journal, 1(3): 13-25 (in Persian).
  13. Sarmad Saeidi, S. 2013. Strategic management and planning in action. Tehran, NY: Haieat, 480 pages (in Persian).
  14. Witlox, F. 2005. Expert system in land-use planning: an overview. Journal Expert Systems with Applications, 29: 437-445.
  15. Yavuza, F. and T. Baycan. Use of SWOT and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management. 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2013), Procedia Technology, 8(2013): 134 – 143.