با همکاری انجمن آبخیزداری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم دریایی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف ارائه راه‌کار جدید وزن‌دهی راهبردهای SWOT در مدیریت یکپارچه حوزه آبخیز آسیاب‌رود مازندران انجام شده است. بر این اساس، ابتدا ماتریس SWOT و جداول شناسایی شاخص‌های راهبردی عوامل درونی و بیرونی تشکیل شد و در ادامه ماتریس‌های ارزیابی عوامل درونی و بیرونی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. راهکار جدیدی که در بحث وزن‌دهی راهبردهای SWOT مورد استفاده قرار گرفت، بر این مبنا بود که امتیار نهایی هر راهبرد در تعداد قوت‌ها و فرصت‌های موثر در آن ضرب شد و نتایج نهایی بر اساس این اولویت‌ها مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. بر اساس تحلیل نقاط قوت و ضعف، تعداد نه نقطه‌ قوت و هشت نقطه‌ ضعف مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت. کمیت و کیفیت مناسب آب با وزن 0.444، سردی هوا با وزن 0.395، بهره‌برداری از آب معدنی با وزن 0.288 و فقر اقتصادی با وزن 0.493 به‌ترتیب به‌عنوان مهمترین نقاط قوت، ضعف، فرصت و تهدید شناسایی شدند. بر اساس ماتریس‌های ارزیابی عوامل درونی و بیرونی در مدل SWOT، راهبرد تقویت حس رضایت‌مندی ساکنین هم بر اساس روش مرسوم و هم راهکار جدید بیشترین امتیاز را به‌ خود اختصاص داد. با نگاه دقیق می‌توان به این نتیجه رسید که تقویت حس رضایت‌مندی بین ساکنین، زمانی به تحقق می‌پیوندد که مشکلات مردم در بخش‌های مختلف معیشتی اعم از اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی، بیشتر مورد توجه قرار گیرد و با ارائه برنامه‌های مدون باعث افزایش رضایت‌مندی و نیز کاهش مهاجرت به مناطق شهری شود. به‌طورکلی، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که با توجه به مشکلات و راه‌حل‌های مطرح شده در این پژوهش، بایستی برنامه‌ریزی صحیح و کاربردی به­منظور جبران ضعف‌ها و تقویت هر چه بهتر قوت‌ها به‌منظور توسعه حوزه آبخیز آسیاب‌رود به‌کار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prioritization of integrated watershed management approachs proportionate to the number of strengths and opportunities in SWOT analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Rasoul Rajabi
  • Ali Nasiri Khiavi
  • Mahin Kalehhouei
  • Sonia Mehri
  • Azam Mumzaei
  • Khadijeh Haji
  • Abdulvahed Khaledi Darvishan

Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

چکیده [English]

The present research aimed at presenting a new SWOT strategy for integrated watershed management of Asiabrood in Mazandaran Province. At first, the SWOT matrix and the tables identifying the strategic indicators of internal and external factors were formed and then internal and external evaluation matrices were analyzed. A new strategy used in the discussion of the weighting of SWOT strategies was based on the fact that the final value of each strategy was multiplied by the number of effective strengths and opportunities and the final results were analyzed based on these priorities. Based on analysis of strengths and weaknesses, nine strengths and eight weaknesses were identified. The suitable water quantity and quality with a weight of 0.444, low air temperature with a weight of 0.395, mineral water utilization with a weight of 0.288 and economic poverty with a weight of 0.493, respectively, were the most important strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. According to the internal-external factors evaluation matrix in the SWOT model, the strategy of increasing the sense of satisfaction of residents, based on the conventional method and the new strategy, gave the highest value. With a careful look, it can be concluded that strengthening the sense of satisfaction between residents happens when People problems in different sectors of livelihoods, including economic, social and cultural, have been considered more and, by presenting correct programs, have increased satisfaction and reduced migration to urban areas. In general, it can be concluded that due to the problems and solutions presented in this study, proper and applied planning should be used to compensate for the weaknesses and to strengthen the strengths as much as possible in the development of Asiabrood watershed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Empowering local communities
  • Integrated watershed management
  • Quantitative strategic planning
  • Sustainable development
  • SWOT analysis
  1. Abyaa, H., M. Nasiri, M. Ebrahimi and A. Movaheda. 2015. Strategic planning fortourism industry using SWOT and QSPM. Management Science Letters, 5(3): 295-300.
  2. ANRWMMP, 2009. Detailed executive studies of watershed management, Asyabrood Watershed. Administration of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Mazandaran Province, Nowshar, Iran, 181 pages.
  3. Afkhami, H. 2018. Provide appropriate management strategy using the QSPM-SWOT compilation model with the aim of organizing nomads, case study: native tribe of ghoud of Arab-Taheri Tabas. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 6(23): 40-50 (in Persian).
  4. Amobeigy, A. and D. Hayati. 2014. Impact assessment of natural resources and the watershed management comprehensive project in the west part of Shiraz County on the local environment as perceived by its beneficiaries. Environmental Science, 11(1): 33-52 (in Persian).
  5. Bohari, A.M., C. Wei Hin and N. Fuad. 2013. The competitiveness of halal food industry in Malaysia: a SWOT-ICT analysis. Journal of Society and Space, 9(1): 1–
  6. Chang, H. and W. Huang. 2006. Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 43: 158-169.
  7. Chang, H.H. and W.C. Huang. 2006. Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 43: 158-169.
  8. Chezgi, J., H. Malekinezhad, M.R. Ekhtesasi and M. Nakhaei. 2018. Providing a comprehensive and appropriate strategy for the construction of an underground dam using the SWOT model QSPM matrix, case study: Keriyan Watershed. Journal of Water and Soil Science (Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources), 22(1): 187-198 (in Persian).
  9. Cui, J., A. Allan and D. Lin. 2019. SWOT analysis and development strategies for underground pedestrian systems. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 87: 127-133.
  10. Divsalar, A.A., P. Shokri Firoozjah and S. Ferdoosi. 2017. Analyzing the strategies of rehabilitation of Shahrood River by SWOT technique. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(4):43-65 (in Persian).
  11. Farrah, J., R. Felix, J.A. Greenstein, E.H.H. Esq, M. Levin, E. Matsumoto, J.B. Rosen, C. Sappington, R.H. Schwarting and D. Warren. 2001. Best practices, report 3, strategic planning. Foundation for Community Association Research, Virginia, US, 1-26.
  12. Ganjali, S., H. Ghassemi and M.M. Hosseinighomi. 2015. Environmental and strategic assessment of the integrated management plan for Lake Urmia Basin. Journal of Wetland Ecobiology, 6(4): 41-48 (in Persian).
  13. Jaafari, Sh., Y. Sakieh, S. Dejkam, S. AlavianPetrudi, M. Yaghubzadeh and A. Danehkar. 2009. Developing of management strstegied for conservation of Miankaleh Wetland using SWOT analysis. Journal of Wetland Ecobiology, 5(2): 5-18 (in Persian).
  14. Jazi, H., Z. Karkehabadi and S. Kamyabi. 2018. Sustainable development strategies in upper basin watershed cities, case study: Garmsar City. Watershed Engineering and Management, 9(4): 426-440 (in Persian).
  15. Kahraman, C., N.C. Demirel and T. Demirel. 2007. Prioritization of e-government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3): 284-298.
  16. Karami, F., H. Panahi and N. Ghannadi. 2016. Prioritizing tourism tevelopment strategtes in AHAR using SWOT-QSPM model. Geographical Journal Development of Tourism Space, 5(18): 21-42 (in Persian).
  17. Khaledi Darvishan, A., A. Jafarpour, S. Janizadeh, Z. Ebrahimi, M. Avand, P. Farzi, F. Jafari, S. Ayobi Ayoblu and A. Katebi Kord. 2020. Application of SWOT analysis in strategic watershed management. Approaches in Applied Management of Watershed, 2: 203-227.
  18. Mousavizadeh, S.R., S. Khorrami and M. Bahreman. 2015. Presenting a strategic plan of integrated water resources management by using SWOT in Bushehr Province. International Journal of Operations and Logistics Management, 4(1): 27-42.
  19. Mutekanga, F.P., A. Kessler, K. Leber and S. Visser. 2013. The use of stakeholder analysis in integrated watershed management. Mountain Research and Development, 33(2):122-131.
  20. Nikolaou, I.E. and K.I. Evangelinos. 2010. A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek mining and mineral industry. Resources Policy, 35: 226-234.
  21. Ozozen Kahraman, S. and V. Calıskan. 2012. Suggestions on rural development for Tuzla River Basin (NW Turkey). Journal of World of Turks, 4(3): 221-235.
  22. Qi, H. and M. Altinakar. 2013. Integrated watershed management with multi-objective land-use optimizations under uncertainty. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 139(3): 239-243.
  23. Ratha, D. and V.P. Agrawal. 2015. A digraph permanent approach to evaluation and analysis of integrated watershed management system. Journal of Hydrology, 1(525): 188-196.
  24. Shahbazi, A., A. Salajegheh, A. Malekiyan and M. Ghorbani. 2018. Application of value engineering in implementing integrated watershed management approach. 13th National Conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering and the Third National Conference on Conservation of Natural Resources and the Environment, Ardebil, 1-7 (in Persian).
  25. Sumiarsih, N.M., D. Legono and R.J. Kodoatie. 2018. Strategic sustainable management for water transmission system: a SWOT-QSPM analysis. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 4(1): 29-40.
  26. Tahseen, S. and B. Karney. 2017. Opportunities for increased hydropower diversion at Niagara: an SWOT analysis. Renewable Energy, 101: 757-770.
  27. Wang, G., S. Mang, H. Cai, Sh. Liu, Zh. Zhang, L. Wang and J.L. Innes. 2016. Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends. Journal of Forestry Research, 27(5): 967-994.
  28. Zheng, L.D. 2004. History of watershed resource management. China Water Resources Management Publishing House, Beijing, 305 pages.
  29. Zorratipour, A. 2014. Watershed management tool to achieve sustainable development of natural resources. 2nd National Symposium on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources, Institute of Mehr-e-Arvand, 1-9 (in Persian).