In collaboration with Iranian Watershed Management Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 MSc Graduate of Environmental Geology, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The Goijeh Bel basin, with extensive outcrops of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary formations and adequate rainfall (342.2 mm annual precipitation), has significant potential for storing and transferring groundwater through fractured media. These hard formation units, located in elevated areas, can supply drinking water to Ahar city without the need for pumping stations. Most springs in the basin originate from hard formations, with their concentration in the center and north indicating the development of aquifers in these units. Overextraction of groundwater through wells and the limitation of alluvial resources have shifted water resource management toward utilizing hard formation water sources. This study investigates the quantity and quality of groundwater resources in the Goijeh Bel basin to identify methods for sustainable water management and assess their suitability as an emergency drinking water source for Ahar city.
 
Materials and methods
The study area is located 10 km southwest of Ahar city within the Aharchai River basin, which ultimately joins the Aras River. Remote sensing and GIS techniques, including the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighted Overlay, and Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) methods, were used for data analysis. Landsat 8 satellite images were processed to generate raster maps for the Normalized Difference Humidity Index (NDHI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). In the AHP method, criteria were ranked and compared pairwise, with weights assigned based on their importance. These weighted layers were overlaid to create a groundwater potential map. Fieldwork involved sampling five groundwater sources and Goijeh Bel River water, followed by hydrochemical analysis of eight major ions (Na⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻, CO₃²⁻, HCO₃⁻, SO₄²⁻), TDS, pH, SAR, %Na, and TH. Electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved solutes, and chloride ion concentrations were assessed to evaluate groundwater quality for drinking and agricultural purposes. Meteorological data from Ahar’s synoptic station over the past 20 years were also analyzed. The spatial distribution of springs was used to validate groundwater potential maps.
 
Results and discussion
Using AHP, Weighted Overlay, and OWA methods, groundwater potential maps were generated based on lithology, line density, elevation, humidity index, slope, drainage density, aspect, and vegetation index. The OWA method showed the highest agreement with spring locations, with approximately 50% of springs situated in areas of medium to high groundwater potential. Qualitative analysis revealed an increase in salinity and EC from upstream to downstream, with EC values ranging from 310 to 1,444 µS/cm. Chloride ion concentrations followed a similar pattern, suggesting a dominant role of sodium and chloride in groundwater salinity. Schuler’s diagram indicated that most groundwater in the basin is suitable for drinking due to the absence of pollutant formations such as salt, clay, or marl. These findings align with studies on hard and karst formations in western Urmia, which also report good-quality groundwater.
 
Conclusions
The southwestern part of the basin exhibits high groundwater potential. Validation of groundwater potential maps using spring locations confirmed the reliability of the OWA method. The groundwater quality assessment demonstrated increasing salinity toward the basin outlet, but most groundwater remains suitable for drinking. Watershed operations, such as biological measures or flood and sediment control structures, can enhance infiltration and aquifer recharge in the hard formations. To quantify aquifer potential and estimate extractable water volumes, geophysical surveys and exploratory drilling in high-potential areas are recommended.

Keywords

Adesunloro, G.M., Olumodeji, I., Itakorode, O.D., 2022. Geo-electrical investigation of ground water potential using vertical electrical sounding. J. Advanc. Res. Rev. 15, 322-329.
Aghanabati, A., 2004. Geology of Iran. Geological Organization of The Country (in Persian).
Alavi Panah, K., 2006. Application of remote sensing in earth science. Iran: University of Tehran, 496 pages (in Persian).
Asghari Moghaddam, A., 2010. Principles of groundwater knowledge. First Edition. Publications of University of Tabriz. 349 pages (in Persian).
Ayazi, M.H., Pirasteh, S., Rizvi, S.M., Safari, H., Ramli, F.M., Pradhan, B., S.M. Rizvi, S.M., 2010. Using ERS-1 synthetic aperture radar for flood delineation, Bhuj Taluk, Kuchch District Gujarat, India. Int. Geoinform. Res. Dev. J. 1, 13-22.
Benjmel, K., Amraoui, F., Boutaleb, S., Ouchchen, M., Tahiri, A., Touab, A., 2020. Mapping of groundwater potential zones in crystalline terrain using remote sensing, GIS techniques, and multicriteria data analysis, case of the Ighrem Region, Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco. J. Water.
Bhuvaneswaran, C., Ganesh, A., Nevedita, S., 2015. Spatial analysis of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques in uppar Odai sub-watershed, Nandiyar, Cauvery basin, Tamilnadu. Int. J. Curr. Res. 7, 20765-20774.
Binh, T.N.K.D., Vromant, N., Hung, N.T., Hens, L., Boon, E.K., 2005. Land cover changes between 1968 and 2003 in Cai Nuoc, Ca Mau Peninsula, Vietnam. J. Environ. Develop. Sustain. 7, 519-536.
Chowdhury, A., Jha, M.K., Machiwal, D., 2003. Application of remote sensing and GIS in groundwater studies: an overview. Proceedings of The International Conference on Water and Environment (WE-2003). J. Ground Water Pollu. 39-50.
Das, S., 2017. Delineation of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain in Gangajalghati block, Bankura district, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques, Model. J. Earth Syst. Environ. 3, 1589-1599.
Ebrahimi, M., 2010. Calculating the vegetation percentage using artificial neural networks and plant indices to improve the modified vertical drought index (Shitour Basin, Yazd). MSc Thesis, 15 pages (in Persian).
Falah, F., Daneshfar, M., Ghorbaninejad, S., 2017. Application of the statistical index model in groundwater potential mapping in the Khorramabad Plain. J. Water Sustain. Develop. 4,89-98 (in Persian).
Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., 2013. GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. J. Nat. Hazards 65, 2105-2128.
Firouzi, F., Tavosi, T., Mahmoudi, P., 2019. Investigating the sensitivity of NDVI and EVI vegetation indices to dry and wet years in arid and semi-arid regions, case study: Sistan plain, Iran. J. Geograph. Data (SEPEHR), 28,163-179 (in Persian).
Ghimire, M., Chapagian, P.S., Shrestha, S., 2017. Mapping of groundwater spring potential zone using geospatial techniques in the Central Nepal Himalayas: A case example of Melamchi-Larke Area. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 00305.
Hardisky, M.A., Klemas, V., Smart, R.M., 1983. The influence of soil salinity, growth form, and leaf moisture on the spectral radiance of Spartina alterniflora canopies. Photogram. Engin. Remote Sens. 49, 77-83.
Haridas, V.R., Aravindan, S., Girish, G., 1998. Remote sensing and its applications for groundwater favourable area identification. Q JGARC. 6, 18e22.
Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage density: hydrophysical approach to quantitative geomorphology. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 56, 275-370.
Jafarian, H., Vaezihir, A., Pirkharati, H., 2018. Determining the factors affecting the hydrochemistry of groundwater resources in the hard and karst formations of western Urmia. J. Hydrogeomorph. 15, 75-94 (in Persian).
Kao, J.J., Lin, H.Y., 1997. Multifactor Spatial analysis for landfill siting. J. Environ. Engin. 122, 902-908.
Koh, C.N., Lee, P.F., Lin, R.S., 2006. Bird species richness patterns of northern Taiwan: primary productivity, human population density, and habitat heterogeneity. J. Diver.  Distribu. 12, 546-554.
Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N., Soundranayagam, J.P., 2011. Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu India: a GIS approach. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 64, 373-381.
Morawitz, D., Blewett, T., Cohen, A., Alberti, M., 2006. Using NDVI to assess vegetative land cover. 277-295.
Murray, J., Ogden, A.T., Mcdaniel, P.M., 2003. Development of a GIS database for ground water recharge assessment of the Palo use. J. Soil Sci. 11, 759-768.
Nabavi, M., 1976. An introduction to the geology of Iran. Geological Organization of the country.
Panabokke, C.R., Perera, A.P.G.R.L., 2005. Groundwater resources of sri lanka. Sri Lanka: Water Resources Board, Chapter 1, 29 pages.
Panel, P., Larsson, I., 1984. Ground water in hard rocks. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 234 pages.
Rahnama, M., Aquajni, H., Fattahi, M., 2012. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information Systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average in Mashhad. J. Geograph. Environ. Hazard. 1, 87-106 (in Persian).
Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W., 1973. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great. Plains with ERTS. Proceedings, Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351, 1, 309-317.
Saaty, T.L., 1977. Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15, 234-281.
Saaty, T.L., 1987. Exploring the interface between the hierarchies, multiple objectives and the fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst. 1, 57-68.
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, London, England, 287 pages.
Saaty, T.L., 1982. Decision making for leaders, Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA, 291 pages.
Saaty, T.L., 1986. Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in complex environments, RWS, Pittsburgh, 199 pages.
Saaty, T.L., 1988. Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process, RWS, Pittsburgh.
Saaty, T.L., Alexander, J.M., 1989. Conflict resolution: The analytic hierarchy approach. J. Computer Sci.
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., 1991. Prediction, projection and forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, 251 pages.
Sahu, A., 2014. Identification and mapping of the water-logged areas in Purba Medinipur part of Keleghai river basin, India: RS and GIS methods. J. Adv. Geosci. 2, 59-65.
Sedaghat, M., 1999. Land and water resources (groundwaters), Payam Noor University Publications (in Persian).
Singhal, B.B.S., 2008. Nature of Hard Rock Aquifers: Hydrogeological Uncertainties and Ambiguities, Dynamics in hard rock aquifers, Chapter 2, 20-39 pages.
Sisay, L., 2007. Application of remote sensing and GIS for groundwater potential zone mapping in Northern Ada’a plain (Modjo catchment). J. Earth Sci.
Sivaramakrishnan, J., Asokan, A., Sooryanarayana, K.R., Hegde, S.S., Benjamin, J., 2015. Occurrence of Ground Water in Hard rock under distinct Geological setup. International Conference on Water Resources, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, India. J. Aqua. Procedia 4, 706-712.
Teimouri, M., Asadi, A., 2021. Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Torbate Jam district using maximum entropy and AHP methods. J. Watershed Engin. Manage. 13, 339-354 (in Persian).
Vaezihir, A., Tabarmayeh, M., 2016. Evaluation of potential groundwater resources in fractured rocks using AHP and SAW methods, case study: Almaneh Basin, Marivan, Iran. J. Water Soil 30, 1461-1477 (in Persian).
Vaezihir, A., Vafadar, M., Aghaie, V., 2019. Evaluation of groundwater potential in the karstic and hard rock formations of Moro Mountain using AHP, SAW and F-AHP methods. J. Geograph. Space 18, 215-234 (in Persian).
Waikar, M.L., Nilawar, A.P., 2014. Identification of groundwater potential zone using remote sensing and GIS Technique. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Engin. Technol. 3, 12163-12174.
Yager, R.R., 1991. Connectives and quantifiers in fuzzy sets. J. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 40, 39-76.