In collaboration with Iranian Watershed Management Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Environmental sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Adaptation to drought is considered as one of the most important approaches in agricultural and watershed management. The purpose of this study is to assess the social acceptance of drought adaptation policies at a regional scale using the reasoned action theory. Information was collected through a questionnaire in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. The population size was 66019 and the sample size was 382. Samples were distributed according to the proportion to size of regions’ population. In each region, four settlements were selected randomly and the questionnaires were distributed randomly to the farmers. The response rate was 96%. Content validity has been approved by nine experts. Reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by test retest method. The correlation coefficients of the study constructs were confirmed; knowledge (r=0.84), attitude (r=0.91), subjective norm (r=0.87), and behavioral intention (r=0.86). The findings showed that knowledge, attitude, subjective norm and behavioral intention of farmers were at a moderate level, although the level of subjective norm was higher than other components. There were significant correlations between the knowledge and attitude (r=0.72), knowledge and subjective norms (r=-0.62), behavioral intention and subjective norms (r=0.67), income and knowledge (r=0.59), income and subjective norms (r=-0.63), literacy level and behavioral intentions (r=0.74). There were a significant difference between the attitude and subjective norms of farmers who engaged in dry farming and other farmers. Analysis of the findings showed that despite the increasing droughts, adaptation policies have not been seriously accepted by farmers. The level of knowledge and attitude of farmers about drought adaptation were not high and farmers' behavior was influenced by the behavior of other farmers rather than influenced by the policies of the institutions.

Keywords

  1. Abdulai, A. and E. Huffman. 2005 The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: the case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(3): 645-660.
  2. Ajzen, I. 2012. Martin Fishbein’s legacy: the reasoned action approach. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(1): 11-27.
  3. Albarracin, D., B.T. Johnson, M. Fishbein and P.A. Muellerleile. 2001. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1): 142–161.
  4. Antle, J.M. 2009. Agriculture and the food system: adaptation to climate change, RFF report. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  5. Asenso-Okyere, K., K. Davis and D. Aredo. 2008. Advancing agriculture in developing countries through knowledge and innovation. International Conference of International Food Policy Research Institute, Ethiopia.
  6. Beedell, J. and T. Rehman. 2000. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers, conservation behaviour. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(1): 117-127.
  7. Brunson, M.W., L.E. Kruger, C.B. Tyler and S.A. Schroeder. 1996. Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: a workshop proceedings. General Technical Report, 142 pages.
  8. Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Management and Planning Organization. 2016. The statistics of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Shahrekord (in Persian).
  9. Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Water Company. 2016. Drought and water management report, Shahrekord (in Persian).
  10. D’Silva, J.L., H.A.M. Shaffril, J. Uli and B.A. Samah. 2010. Acceptance and sustainability of contract farming among youth in Malaysia. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5: 350-356.
  11. ENEA Consulting. 2012. The concept and issues of social acceptance for industrial projects. Retrieved April 1, 2018 from http://www.enea-consulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ENEA-Consulting-Social-acceptability-of-industrialprojects.pdf
  12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 128 pages.
  13. Gallagher, A. 2018. Small-scale farmers’ intentions to carry out conservation-oriented agriculture through participation in the Entry-Level Stewardship Agri-Environment Scheme. Msc Thesis, Uppsala. 55 pages.
  14. Hale, J.L., B.J. Householder and K.L. Greene. 2002. The theory of reasoned action. The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, 14: 259-286.
  15. Hsieh, H. andE. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277– 1288.
  16. Montano, D.E. and D. Kasprzyk. 2008. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior and the integrated behavioral model. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 124 pages.
  17. Othman, N. and F. Kutty. 2010. Entrepreneurship behavior amongst Malaysian University students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(1): 23-32.
  18. Puupponen, A., T. Kortetmäki, A. Paloviita and M. Järvelä. 2015. Social acceptance of climate change adaptation in farms and food enterprises: a case study in Finland. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 22(2): 105-123.
  19. Ranjbar, Z. and A.S. Karami. 2013. Extension training programs and their relationship with the sustainability of agricultural systems studied: wheat farmers in Kermanshah. Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 9(1): 1-14 (in Persian).
  20. Rehman, T., C.M. Yates, K. McKemey, C.J. Garforth, R. J. Cooke, R.B. Tranter, J.R. Park and P.T. Dorward. 2003. Modelling the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in South West England using the Theory of Reasoned Action and Mathematical Programming. A Contributed Paper Presented at the Agricultural Economics Society Conference, April 2003, Seale Hayne, England, 37 pages.
  21. Thomassin, A., C.S. White, S.S. Stead and G. David. 2010. Social acceptability of a marine protected area: the case of Reunion Island. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53(4): 169-179.
  22. Wilson, A., J. Vickery and C. Pendlebury. 2007. Agri-environment schemes as a tool for reversing declining populations of grassland waders: mixed benefits from environmentally sensitive areas in England. Biological Conservation, 136(1): 128-135.
  23. Zamani, Gh., S. Gholamrezaee and M. Mantizadeh. 2015. Examination of environmental ethical norms of farmers surveyed in Shiraz. Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 11(2): 49-65 (in Persian).